翻訳と辞書 |
Rowe v Electoral Commissioner : ウィキペディア英語版 | Rowe v Electoral Commissioner
''Rowe v Electoral Commissioner'' 〔(2010) 243 CLR 1〕 is a High Court of Australia case dealing with the validity of Commonwealth legislation that sought to restrict the time in which a voter may seek to enrol in an election (or alter their enrolment details) after the writs for such an election have been issued by the Governor General. One of those provisions, s 102(4), prevents the Electoral Commissioner from considering claims for enrolment lodged after 8 pm on the date of the issue of writs for an election for the House of Representatives or the Senate until after the close of polling. Another provision, s 102( 4AA), prevents consideration of claims for transfer of enrolment from one divisional roll to another from 8 pm on the date of the close of the rolls for an election until after the close of polling. A third provision, s 155, provides that the rolls close on the third working day after the date of the writs. == Decision ==
On 6 August 2010, the Court by majority ruled that such restrictions were invalid.〔Specifically, the Court declared that items 20, 24, 28, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 and 52 of Schedule 1 to the Electoral and Referendum Amendment (Electoral Integrity and Other Measures) Act 2006 (Cth) are invalid.〕 However, as this case was decided urgently (as the federal election was to be held soon), the Court did not publish reasons until 15 December 2010. ()
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Rowe v Electoral Commissioner」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|